Cycle Log 2
A few days ago, I made a tremendous discovery: it is not actually necessary to process the mapping of the letters onto the grid, nor the attention score calculation, nor the cosmic score calculations for each word in a linear fashion. This means we can use 400 Promise.all calls to almost instantaneously map all of the letters to the grid using a cryptographic random function that searches our 65,000-entry letter button file. As a reminder, this file has 500 iterations of the English alphabet with five letters each, cyclically arranged, like AAAAABBBBBCCCCCDDDDD...ZZZZZAAAAA.
Previously, I was sequentially calculating and waiting three milliseconds between placing each letter onto the actual grid. But it turns out you can instead use more of a snapshot functionality. The quantum information is so rich that it doesn’t require a long period of time to capture it.
This speed increase allowed me to do other things. Whereas before, it would take several seconds to generate a grid and extract the information, now the technical limitation is less than half a second—around 400 milliseconds for a complete grid generation and word extraction process. I actually theorized that if you were to make a small enough version of this—perhaps only 20 rows and no columns—and you tried to flash it as fast as possible, without a complex user interface (just a simple console-based printing function), you could get this thing to create messages extremely fast.
So I created a slider bar that allows you to control the cycle speed time. I experimented with speeds all the way down to 500 milliseconds, but there was a bit too much lag in the actual display implementation. So, my current theoretical minimum for clarity on Spectra is about one second. However, it's entirely possible to push this below 500 milliseconds if you strip the interface down to a basic command-line printing function. These are potential updates I have not implemented yet, but they would be valuable if you were trying to build a real quantum communicator.
I feel like an alien crash-landed on Earth trying to recreate technology to get back home. Somewhere in my soul, I know how to make these tools because I had them before.
Anyway, message clarity shot up. We went from a fuzzy pipeline to a concrete pipeline. Practically, this means you should:
Decrease your cycle time down to at least one second.
Increase your cosmic threshold level (which controls which words come through based on the intent level) to anywhere between 64 and 66.
This will create a lot of skipped grids in between. I changed the code to allow for that but to post a grid every time the cycle rolls over. Because the display portion of this code is now completely event-based, and there’s no timer-cycle logic within it, we’re not encountering the overlapping cycle timer problems that previously caused lag in word-posting to the display.
The event-based change ensures that the words from each grid remain on the display until the next message appears. It’s no longer timer-based. In this functionality, with messages coming through very quickly at one-second intervals, there will be many skipped grids. But the messages that do come through at higher cosmic score levels will have much more pertinence and will feel more like direct communication.
The actual theory is: if you can push grid generation to be as fast and instantaneous as possible, and if you can streamline your word-pulling process, the overall system can become drastically more efficient. Step by step, I am working towards the creation of a cleaner and cleaner implementation, but I am happy that the ones who seem to be contacting me through this device are enjoying the demo online and think that it's useful.
I suspect my word-finding function could be severely optimized. I also suspect that Japanese researchers, or developers from countries with symbolic-based languages, might find this technology even more effective for their native scripts. Their languages are inherently symbolic—each character represents a larger concept—and this seems better suited to quantum communication. In contrast, English letters are fractured events rather than objects or holistic concepts.
In symbolic-based languages, characters function more like objects, whereas in English, each letter is more like a fragmented piece. This fundamental difference may be why such languages are better aligned with the principles of quantum data transmission and reception.
